My father maintained the theory
that there were two classes of hotel for business travellers: the better sort, where
if one answered “yes” to this question the lady would be asked to leave, and
the seedier sort, where if one answered “no” a lady would be thrown in.
Something similar is now to be expected by those who are looking for episcopal preferment. If a nice man from your
senior staff meeting asks you if you are looking for some companionship, be
careful how you answer. The Wash House is not as fun as it sounds.
If you are content with your
presbyteral status, of course, you will please yourself.
*
While on the subject of throwing
women in, readers will remember proposals to allow senior women clergy to
attend and speak at meetings of the House of Bishops, upon which we commented
in detail here. The manner of their election has now been fixed, and we can say
that although the bishops are not as forward-thinking as we were in our
proposals, the franchise on which these women will be elected is at least
delightfully fancy. Peter Snow will have a whale of a time explaining how it
all works.
It is pleasing to see, too, that female
electors from the Royal Peculiars are to take part. Not to include the canons
of Westminster Abbey and St George’s Windsor in this new system would surely
have caused a loss of confidence in the leadership of the Church of England. Rightly
so: the sex of Her Majesty herself is, of course, the clinching argument both
for and against the consecration of women, and this is just as it should be.
*
Meanwhile back at the cutting edge of
ministry it is David Walker, Bishop of Dudley who is to be the next Bishop of
Manchester. Here, too, the powers-that-be in the Church of England are
ever-so-cautiously following our lead: Bishop Walker is a married man, but he has the beard of James I of blessed memory,
and this is a criterion for selection certain to be encouraged.
No comments:
Post a Comment